Angola vs Ethiopia PDR: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Angola
14,299 t
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR
14,695 t
in 1992
Angola rank
93rd
Ethiopia PDR rank
91st

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Angola
  • Ethiopia PDR
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 14,695 t against 14,299 t in Angola, a difference of 396 t.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 93rd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st of 201 countries.

Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Ethiopia PDR Difference Ahead
1960s 1,692 t 9,428 t 7,736 t Ethiopia PDR
1970s 2,747 t 10,682 t 7,934 t Ethiopia PDR
1980s 3,498 t 12,344 t 8,846 t Ethiopia PDR
1990s 3,432 t 14,778 t 11,346 t Ethiopia PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Angola or Ethiopia PDR?
Ethiopia PDR, at 14,695 t against 14,299 t in Angola as of 1992.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Angola and Ethiopia PDR?
396 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ethiopia PDR?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Angola and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Angola ranks 93rd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).