Angola vs Slovakia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Angola
14,299 t
in 2023
Slovakia
15,361 t
in 2023
Angola rank
93rd
Slovakia rank
90th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Angola
  • Slovakia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 15,361 t against 14,299 t in Angola, a difference of 1,062 t.

That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 90th of 201 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,437 t 18,361 t 14,924 t Slovakia
2000s 5,014 t 15,782 t 10,768 t Slovakia
2010s 11,394 t 17,234 t 5,839 t Slovakia
2020s 13,727 t 16,749 t 3,022 t Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Angola or Slovakia?
Slovakia, at 15,361 t against 14,299 t in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Angola and Slovakia?
1,062 t, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Slovakia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Angola and Slovakia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Angola ranks 93rd and Slovakia ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).