Argentina vs Germany: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Argentina
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 186,705 t against 164,204 t in Argentina, a difference of 22,501 t.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.
Argentina ranks 20th and Germany ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35,160 t | 255,990 t | 220,829 t | Germany |
| 1970s | 41,728 t | 324,273 t | 282,545 t | Germany |
| 1980s | 47,421 t | 358,574 t | 311,154 t | Germany |
| 1990s | 63,075 t | 281,934 t | 218,859 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 97,758 t | 260,472 t | 162,714 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 125,411 t | 246,125 t | 120,714 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 189,408 t | 188,799 t | 608.75 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Argentina or Germany?
- Germany, at 186,705 t against 164,204 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Argentina and Germany?
- 22,501 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Germany?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Germany rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Argentina ranks 20th and Germany ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).