Argentina vs Poland: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Argentina
- Poland
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 164,204 t against 157,596 t in Poland, a difference of 6,608 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Argentina ranks 20th and Poland ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35,160 t | 126,089 t | 90,929 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 41,728 t | 195,912 t | 154,183 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 47,421 t | 204,495 t | 157,074 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 63,075 t | 140,030 t | 76,955 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 97,758 t | 142,571 t | 44,813 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 125,411 t | 149,312 t | 23,901 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 189,408 t | 145,905 t | 43,503 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Argentina or Poland?
- Argentina, at 164,204 t against 157,596 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Argentina and Poland?
- 6,608 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Argentina ranks 20th and Poland ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).