Australia and New Zealand vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Australia and New Zealand
226,872 t
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
23,395 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
10th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 226,872 t against 23,395 t in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 203,477 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 9.7 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 10th of 186 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Difference Ahead
1960s 25,923 t 2,866 t 23,057 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 41,917 t 4,874 t 37,043 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 52,500 t 7,067 t 45,433 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 89,006 t 8,210 t 80,796 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 114,372 t 13,744 t 100,629 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 147,001 t 21,234 t 125,767 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 209,898 t 23,351 t 186,547 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Australia and New Zealand or Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 226,872 t against 23,395 t in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Australia and New Zealand and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
203,477 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-nitrogen/australia-and-new-zealand/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-nitrogen/australia-and-new-zealand/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/">Australia and New Zealand vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).