Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Australia and New Zealand
226,872 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
773,202 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 773,202 t against 226,872 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 546,330 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 3.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 186 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 25,923 t 136,013 t 110,090 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 41,917 t 186,413 t 144,496 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 52,500 t 252,367 t 199,867 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 89,006 t 339,078 t 250,073 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 114,372 t 433,535 t 319,162 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 147,001 t 641,010 t 494,008 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 209,898 t 751,040 t 541,142 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 773,202 t against 226,872 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
546,330 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-nitrogen/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-nitrogen/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).