Australia vs Republic of Moldova: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Australia
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Australia currently reports 222,858 t against 12,411 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 210,447 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 18.0 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 13th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 93,239 t | 12,756 t | 80,482 t | Australia |
| 2000s | 110,952 t | 6,930 t | 104,022 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 142,650 t | 9,132 t | 133,518 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 205,410 t | 10,940 t | 194,470 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Australia or Republic of Moldova?
- Australia, at 222,858 t against 12,411 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Australia and Republic of Moldova?
- 210,447 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Australia ranks 13th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).