Azerbaijan vs Panama: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Azerbaijan
8,884 t
in 2023
Panama
7,479 t
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
111th
Panama rank
114th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Panama
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 8,884 t against 7,479 t in Panama, a difference of 1,405 t.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 111th and Panama ranks 114th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 4,990 t 4,358 t 632.01 t Azerbaijan
2000s 4,134 t 4,298 t 163.47 t Panama
2010s 8,407 t 4,970 t 3,437 t Azerbaijan
2020s 7,646 t 6,724 t 922.34 t Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Panama?
Azerbaijan, at 8,884 t against 7,479 t in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Panama?
1,405 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Panama?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Panama rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Azerbaijan ranks 111th and Panama ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).