Bangladesh vs Germany: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bangladesh
- Germany
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 204,601 t against 186,705 t in Germany, a difference of 17,896 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 17th and Germany ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,536 t | 255,990 t | 228,454 t | Germany |
| 1970s | 42,635 t | 324,273 t | 281,638 t | Germany |
| 1980s | 65,913 t | 358,574 t | 292,661 t | Germany |
| 1990s | 116,440 t | 281,934 t | 165,493 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 146,539 t | 260,472 t | 113,933 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 171,337 t | 246,125 t | 74,788 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 201,218 t | 188,799 t | 12,419 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Bangladesh or Germany?
- Bangladesh, at 204,601 t against 186,705 t in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Bangladesh and Germany?
- 17,896 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Germany?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Germany rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Bangladesh ranks 17th and Germany ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).