Belarus vs Ethiopia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 91,712 t against 79,864 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 11,848 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 30th and Ethiopia ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71,248 t | 15,852 t | 55,396 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 75,701 t | 21,735 t | 53,966 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 89,123 t | 47,784 t | 41,339 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 88,367 t | 71,491 t | 16,876 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Ethiopia?
- Belarus, at 91,712 t against 79,864 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Ethiopia?
- 11,848 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Ethiopia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Ethiopia ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).