Belarus vs Italy: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 118,289 t against 91,712 t in Belarus, a difference of 26,577 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 30th and Italy ranks 27th of 201 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,648 t | 174,374 t | 101,725 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 75,701 t | 156,583 t | 80,882 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 89,123 t | 132,694 t | 43,571 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 88,367 t | 123,206 t | 34,839 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Italy?
- Italy, at 118,289 t against 91,712 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Italy?
- 26,577 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Italy ranks 27th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).