Belarus vs Romania: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Belarus
91,712 t
in 2023
Romania
80,926 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
30th
Romania rank
32nd

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Belarus
  • Romania
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 91,712 t against 80,926 t in Romania, a difference of 10,786 t.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Romania ahead.

Belarus ranks 30th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 72,648 t 83,617 t 10,968 t Romania
2000s 75,701 t 71,667 t 4,033 t Belarus
2010s 89,123 t 74,852 t 14,272 t Belarus
2020s 88,367 t 83,057 t 5,309 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Romania?
Belarus, at 91,712 t against 80,926 t in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Romania?
10,786 t, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Romania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Romania rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Belarus ranks 30th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).