Belarus vs Western Africa: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Western Africa
How they compare
Western Africa currently reports 151,283 t against 91,712 t in Belarus, a difference of 59,571 t.
That makes Western Africa's figure about 1.6 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 30th and Western Africa ranks 27th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Western Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,648 t | 69,888 t | 2,761 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 75,701 t | 89,297 t | 13,596 t | Western Africa |
| 2010s | 89,123 t | 141,794 t | 52,671 t | Western Africa |
| 2020s | 88,367 t | 167,171 t | 78,804 t | Western Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Western Africa?
- Western Africa, at 151,283 t against 91,712 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Western Africa?
- 59,571 t, with Western Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Western Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Western Africa rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Western Africa ranks 27th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).