Belize vs Botswana: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 2,015 t against 1,888 t in Belize, a difference of 127 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Belize ranks 144th and Botswana ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 117.85 t | 556.48 t | 438.63 t | Botswana |
| 1970s | 162.13 t | 718.39 t | 556.26 t | Botswana |
| 1980s | 240.1 t | 764.09 t | 523.98 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 299.39 t | 727.76 t | 428.37 t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 732.09 t | 710.08 t | 22 t | Belize |
| 2010s | 1,456 t | 1,768 t | 311.83 t | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1,637 t | 1,765 t | 128.32 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Botswana?
- Botswana, at 2,015 t against 1,888 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Botswana?
- 127 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Botswana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Botswana rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 144th and Botswana ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).