Benin vs Cuba: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Benin
9,875 t
in 2023
Cuba
9,331 t
in 2023
Benin rank
108th
Cuba rank
110th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Benin
  • Cuba
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 9,875 t against 9,331 t in Cuba, a difference of 544 t.

That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Benin ranks 108th and Cuba ranks 110th of 201 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 1,166 t 20,143 t 18,976 t Cuba
1970s 1,573 t 26,810 t 25,237 t Cuba
1980s 2,229 t 40,583 t 38,354 t Cuba
1990s 3,307 t 24,585 t 21,277 t Cuba
2000s 2,630 t 14,093 t 11,463 t Cuba
2010s 4,377 t 15,292 t 10,915 t Cuba
2020s 9,779 t 10,246 t 467.76 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Benin or Cuba?
Benin, at 9,875 t against 9,331 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Benin and Cuba?
544 t, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Benin and Cuba rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Benin ranks 108th and Cuba ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).