Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 7,479 t against 6,862 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 617 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Panama ranks 105th of 186 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,169 t | 4,358 t | 1,811 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 9,287 t | 4,298 t | 4,989 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 14,920 t | 4,970 t | 9,950 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 9,475 t | 6,724 t | 2,750 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Panama?
- Panama, at 7,479 t against 6,862 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
- 617 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Panama ranks 105th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).