Brunei Darussalam vs Eswatini: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,092 t against 906.06 t in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 185.94 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Brunei Darussalam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 161st and Eswatini ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 63.86 t | 498.28 t | 434.42 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 80.2 t | 736.12 t | 655.92 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 145.95 t | 989.53 t | 843.58 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 196.35 t | 698.61 t | 502.26 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 550.58 t | 784.43 t | 233.85 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 753.03 t | 931.31 t | 178.29 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 895.88 t | 1,133 t | 237.18 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Brunei Darussalam or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 1,092 t against 906.06 t in Brunei Darussalam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Brunei Darussalam and Eswatini?
- 185.94 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Eswatini rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 161st and Eswatini ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).