Burundi vs Estonia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 5,598 t against 5,594 t in Burundi, a difference of 4 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 125th and Estonia ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 646.35 t | 6,288 t | 5,642 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 763.49 t | 4,586 t | 3,823 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 2,534 t | 5,475 t | 2,941 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 4,883 t | 5,996 t | 1,113 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 5,598 t against 5,594 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Estonia?
- 4 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Estonia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 125th and Estonia ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).