Cabo Verde vs Malta: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Malta
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 251.99 t against 229.97 t in Malta, a difference of 22.02 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 172nd and Malta ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 54.41 t | 211.29 t | 156.88 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 84.81 t | 293.37 t | 208.56 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 196.68 t | 388.39 t | 191.71 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 491.28 t | 454.26 t | 37.02 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 414.37 t | 436.1 t | 21.73 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 277.63 t | 317.98 t | 40.35 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 249.86 t | 250.92 t | 1.06 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Malta?
- Cabo Verde, at 251.99 t against 229.97 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Malta?
- 22.02 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Malta rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 172nd and Malta ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).