Cambodia vs Ecuador: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cambodia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 24,946 t against 24,884 t in Ecuador, a difference of 62 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Cambodia ranks 67th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,161 t | 9,258 t | 2,097 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 6,452 t | 14,906 t | 8,453 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 6,610 t | 17,661 t | 11,052 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 11,212 t | 22,010 t | 10,798 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 13,324 t | 30,446 t | 17,122 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 19,215 t | 36,069 t | 16,854 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 22,652 t | 33,242 t | 10,590 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Cambodia or Ecuador?
- Cambodia, at 24,946 t against 24,884 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Cambodia and Ecuador?
- 62 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Ecuador rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Cambodia ranks 67th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).