Cameroon vs Kyrgyzstan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Cameroon
12,674 t
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
12,625 t
in 2023
Cameroon rank
101st
Kyrgyzstan rank
102nd

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cameroon
  • Kyrgyzstan
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 12,674 t against 12,625 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 49 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Cameroon ranks 101st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 102nd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 6,142 t 9,211 t 3,068 t Kyrgyzstan
2000s 8,573 t 8,779 t 205.44 t Kyrgyzstan
2010s 11,709 t 10,882 t 826.52 t Cameroon
2020s 12,681 t 12,473 t 208.58 t Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Cameroon or Kyrgyzstan?
Cameroon, at 12,674 t against 12,625 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Cameroon and Kyrgyzstan?
49 t, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Cameroon ranks 101st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).