Central African Republic vs Yugoslav SFR: Leaching β Cropland nitrogen
Leaching β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central African Republic
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 83,798 t against 4,424 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 79,374 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 18.9 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 345.81 t | 72,198 t | 71,852 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 732.21 t | 94,977 t | 94,245 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 1,568 t | 109,426 t | 107,857 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 2,003 t | 91,656 t | 89,653 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching β cropland nitrogen, Central African Republic or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 83,798 t against 4,424 t in Central African Republic as of 1991.
- What is the difference in leaching β cropland nitrogen between Central African Republic and Yugoslav SFR?
- 79,374 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Central African Republic and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for leaching β cropland nitrogen?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 31st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).