Central Asia vs Italy: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central Asia
- Italy
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 302,601 t against 118,289 t in Italy, a difference of 184,312 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 2.6 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 24th and Italy ranks 27th of 32 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 168,193 t | 135,675 t | 32,518 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 256,637 t | 173,349 t | 83,288 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 330,412 t | 199,759 t | 130,653 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 205,321 t | 177,200 t | 28,121 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 160,082 t | 156,583 t | 3,500 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 234,609 t | 132,694 t | 101,915 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 290,723 t | 123,206 t | 167,517 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Central Asia or Italy?
- Central Asia, at 302,601 t against 118,289 t in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Central Asia and Italy?
- 184,312 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Italy?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Italy rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Central Asia ranks 24th and Italy ranks 27th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).