Chad vs Ethiopia PDR: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chad
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Chad currently reports 15,497 t against 14,695 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 802 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 88th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,372 t | 9,428 t | 8,056 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 1,533 t | 10,682 t | 9,148 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 1,945 t | 12,344 t | 10,399 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 2,629 t | 14,778 t | 12,149 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Chad or Ethiopia PDR?
- Chad, at 15,497 t against 14,695 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Chad and Ethiopia PDR?
- 802 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chad and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Chad ranks 88th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).