Chile vs Serbia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Chile
35,234 t
in 2023
Serbia
34,560 t
in 2023
Chile rank
55th
Serbia rank
56th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Chile
  • Serbia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 35,234 t against 34,560 t in Serbia, a difference of 674 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Chile ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 56th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 33,732 t 45,168 t 11,436 t Serbia
2010s 36,616 t 37,460 t 844.19 t Serbia
2020s 35,146 t 34,111 t 1,035 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Serbia?
Chile, at 35,234 t against 34,560 t in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Serbia?
674 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Chile ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).