Colombia vs Philippines: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Philippines
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 108,802 t against 97,042 t in Philippines, a difference of 11,760 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 28th and Philippines ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 6 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,885 t | 25,818 t | 67.04 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 35,932 t | 38,038 t | 2,106 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 50,669 t | 48,165 t | 2,504 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 74,134 t | 66,225 t | 7,909 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 91,404 t | 80,849 t | 10,555 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 102,987 t | 91,527 t | 11,460 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 107,897 t | 104,625 t | 3,273 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Philippines?
- Colombia, at 108,802 t against 97,042 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Philippines?
- 11,760 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Philippines rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 28th and Philippines ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).