Croatia vs Mali: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Croatia
- Mali
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 13,846 t against 13,585 t in Mali, a difference of 261 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 94th and Mali ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,532 t | 4,174 t | 14,359 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 22,061 t | 8,794 t | 13,267 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 15,946 t | 15,399 t | 546.47 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 15,006 t | 13,381 t | 1,625 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Mali?
- Croatia, at 13,846 t against 13,585 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Mali?
- 261 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Mali rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Croatia ranks 94th and Mali ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).