Cuba vs Niger: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Cuba
9,331 t
in 2023
Niger
8,112 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
110th
Niger rank
112th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cuba
  • Niger
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 9,331 t against 8,112 t in Niger, a difference of 1,219 t.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Niger's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 110th and Niger ranks 112th of 201 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 20,143 t 1,769 t 18,373 t Cuba
1970s 26,810 t 2,155 t 24,656 t Cuba
1980s 40,583 t 2,408 t 38,175 t Cuba
1990s 24,585 t 2,807 t 21,777 t Cuba
2000s 14,093 t 4,166 t 9,927 t Cuba
2010s 15,292 t 6,282 t 9,009 t Cuba
2020s 10,246 t 7,855 t 2,391 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Niger?
Cuba, at 9,331 t against 8,112 t in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Niger?
1,219 t, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Niger?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Niger rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Cuba ranks 110th and Niger ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).