Cyprus vs Sierra Leone: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cyprus
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1,757 t against 1,689 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 68 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 148th and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,140 t | 214.11 t | 925.41 t | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 1,560 t | 323.49 t | 1,236 t | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 1,736 t | 415.42 t | 1,321 t | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 2,390 t | 483.44 t | 1,906 t | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 2,071 t | 408.2 t | 1,663 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 1,874 t | 1,098 t | 776.15 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 1,707 t | 1,708 t | 1.19 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Cyprus or Sierra Leone?
- Cyprus, at 1,757 t against 1,689 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Cyprus and Sierra Leone?
- 68 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Sierra Leone rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Cyprus ranks 148th and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).