Cyprus vs Suriname: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Cyprus
1,757 t
in 2023
Suriname
1,786 t
in 2023
Cyprus rank
148th
Suriname rank
147th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cyprus
  • Suriname
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1,786 t against 1,757 t in Cyprus, a difference of 29 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 148th and Suriname ranks 147th of 201 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 1,140 t 330.05 t 809.48 t Cyprus
1970s 1,560 t 591.8 t 968.18 t Cyprus
1980s 1,736 t 919.36 t 817.08 t Cyprus
1990s 2,390 t 762.55 t 1,627 t Cyprus
2000s 2,071 t 980.99 t 1,090 t Cyprus
2010s 1,874 t 1,264 t 609.73 t Cyprus
2020s 1,707 t 1,508 t 198.71 t Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Cyprus or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1,786 t against 1,757 t in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Cyprus and Suriname?
29 t, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Suriname rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Cyprus ranks 148th and Suriname ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).