Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Czechia
36,972 t
in 2023
Kazakhstan
38,848 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
52nd
Kazakhstan rank
50th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Czechia
  • Kazakhstan
020.0k40.0k60.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 38,848 t against 36,972 t in Czechia, a difference of 1,876 t.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Czechia ranks 52nd and Kazakhstan ranks 50th of 201 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 45,704 t 40,708 t 4,996 t Czechia
2000s 40,446 t 29,099 t 11,347 t Czechia
2010s 47,278 t 39,824 t 7,454 t Czechia
2020s 41,901 t 38,921 t 2,979 t Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 38,848 t against 36,972 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
1,876 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Czechia ranks 52nd and Kazakhstan ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).