Czechia vs Mongolia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 40,212 t against 36,972 t in Czechia, a difference of 3,240 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 52nd and Mongolia ranks 49th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,704 t | 19,169 t | 26,535 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 40,446 t | 17,906 t | 22,540 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 47,278 t | 27,722 t | 19,556 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 41,901 t | 39,887 t | 2,014 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 40,212 t against 36,972 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Mongolia?
- 3,240 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mongolia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Mongolia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 52nd and Mongolia ranks 49th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).