Dominica vs Kiribati: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- Kiribati
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 77.01 t against 68.69 t in Kiribati, a difference of 8.32 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 186th and Kiribati ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.77 t | 21.32 t | 8.45 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 89.68 t | 24.09 t | 65.58 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 160.96 t | 28.12 t | 132.84 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 225.77 t | 33.45 t | 192.32 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 116.19 t | 52.19 t | 64 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 92.68 t | 64.89 t | 27.8 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 82.83 t | 68.29 t | 14.54 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Kiribati?
- Dominica, at 77.01 t against 68.69 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Kiribati?
- 8.32 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Kiribati rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 186th and Kiribati ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).