Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 24,884 t against 23,498 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1,386 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 70th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,860 t | 9,258 t | 4,398 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 7,492 t | 14,906 t | 7,414 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 6,870 t | 17,661 t | 10,791 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 10,549 t | 22,010 t | 11,461 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 14,705 t | 30,446 t | 15,741 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 19,372 t | 36,069 t | 16,697 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 25,044 t | 33,242 t | 8,197 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 24,884 t against 23,498 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 1,386 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 70th and Ecuador ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).