Estonia vs Guinea: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Guinea
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 5,598 t against 5,235 t in Guinea, a difference of 363 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 124th and Guinea ranks 127th of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,288 t | 1,058 t | 5,230 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 4,586 t | 1,654 t | 2,933 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 5,475 t | 2,980 t | 2,496 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 5,996 t | 4,640 t | 1,355 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Guinea?
- Estonia, at 5,598 t against 5,235 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Guinea?
- 363 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Guinea rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 124th and Guinea ranks 127th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).