Estonia vs Senegal: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 5,750 t against 5,598 t in Estonia, a difference of 152 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 124th and Senegal ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,288 t | 3,034 t | 3,254 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 4,586 t | 3,997 t | 589.33 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 5,475 t | 6,480 t | 1,005 t | Senegal |
| 2020s | 5,996 t | 7,938 t | 1,943 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 5,750 t against 5,598 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Senegal?
- 152 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Senegal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Senegal rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 124th and Senegal ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).