Eswatini vs Montenegro: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Montenegro
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,092 t against 983.79 t in Montenegro, a difference of 108.21 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Eswatini ranks 158th and Montenegro ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 868.51 t | 1,304 t | 435.66 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 931.31 t | 1,127 t | 195.24 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 1,133 t | 986.77 t | 146.29 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Montenegro?
- Eswatini, at 1,092 t against 983.79 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 108.21 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Montenegro rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 158th and Montenegro ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).