Ethiopia PDR vs Sri Lanka: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 14,695 t against 14,469 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 226 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,428 t | 7,581 t | 1,846 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 10,682 t | 8,948 t | 1,733 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 12,344 t | 12,995 t | 650.66 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 14,778 t | 13,091 t | 1,686 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Sri Lanka?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 14,695 t against 14,469 t in Sri Lanka as of 1992.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 226 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).