Ethiopia vs Malaysia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 79,864 t against 57,978 t in Malaysia, a difference of 21,886 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.4 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Malaysia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 33rd and Malaysia ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,852 t | 41,585 t | 25,733 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 21,735 t | 66,738 t | 45,003 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 47,784 t | 71,434 t | 23,649 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 71,491 t | 56,297 t | 15,194 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Malaysia?
- Ethiopia, at 79,864 t against 57,978 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Malaysia?
- 21,886 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Malaysia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Malaysia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 33rd and Malaysia ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).