Fiji vs Liberia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Fiji
1,204 t
in 2023
Liberia
1,288 t
in 2023
Fiji rank
157th
Liberia rank
155th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Fiji
  • Liberia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 1,288 t against 1,204 t in Fiji, a difference of 84 t.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 157th and Liberia ranks 155th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Liberia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 594.11 t 312.85 t 281.26 t Fiji
1970s 1,093 t 584.14 t 508.98 t Fiji
1980s 1,504 t 550.98 t 953.28 t Fiji
1990s 1,595 t 433.81 t 1,161 t Fiji
2000s 1,250 t 701.59 t 548.61 t Fiji
2010s 1,064 t 1,351 t 286.76 t Liberia
2020s 1,080 t 1,392 t 312.45 t Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Fiji or Liberia?
Liberia, at 1,288 t against 1,204 t in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Fiji and Liberia?
84 t, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Liberia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Fiji ranks 157th and Liberia ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).