Fiji vs Luxembourg: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Fiji
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 1,204 t against 913.8 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 290.2 t.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 157th and Luxembourg ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,250 t | 1,007 t | 243.58 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 1,064 t | 1,116 t | 51.77 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1,080 t | 982.87 t | 97 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Fiji or Luxembourg?
- Fiji, at 1,204 t against 913.8 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Fiji and Luxembourg?
- 290.2 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Luxembourg rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Fiji ranks 157th and Luxembourg ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).