Guatemala vs Serbia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 34,560 t against 33,857 t in Guatemala, a difference of 703 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,771 t | 45,168 t | 19,397 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 31,960 t | 37,460 t | 5,500 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 33,978 t | 34,111 t | 132.35 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 34,560 t against 33,857 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 703 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).