Guatemala vs Sudan (former): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 33,857 t against 33,266 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 591 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Guatemala ranks 57th and Sudan (former) ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,215 t | 6,887 t | 1,672 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 8,708 t | 10,361 t | 1,653 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 11,279 t | 15,171 t | 3,892 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 17,988 t | 18,042 t | 54.08 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 24,411 t | 28,787 t | 4,376 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 30,076 t | 35,700 t | 5,624 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Sudan (former)?
- Guatemala, at 33,857 t against 33,266 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Sudan (former)?
- 591 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Guatemala and Sudan (former) rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 57th and Sudan (former) ranks 58th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).