Guinea-Bissau vs Suriname: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Suriname
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1,872 t against 1,786 t in Suriname, a difference of 86 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 550.18 t | 330.05 t | 220.13 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1970s | 674.35 t | 591.8 t | 82.54 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 937.05 t | 919.36 t | 17.69 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | 1,084 t | 762.55 t | 321.33 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 1,235 t | 980.99 t | 254.14 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 1,858 t | 1,264 t | 594.22 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 1,953 t | 1,508 t | 444.45 t | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Guinea-Bissau or Suriname?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1,872 t against 1,786 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Guinea-Bissau and Suriname?
- 86 t, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Suriname rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).