Haiti vs Rwanda: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Haiti
4,741 t
in 2023
Rwanda
4,195 t
in 2023
Haiti rank
128th
Rwanda rank
131st

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Haiti
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 4,741 t against 4,195 t in Rwanda, a difference of 546 t.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.

Haiti ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 131st of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 4,690 t 289.81 t 4,401 t Haiti
1970s 5,970 t 447.59 t 5,522 t Haiti
1980s 3,201 t 673.42 t 2,528 t Haiti
1990s 3,366 t 735.72 t 2,630 t Haiti
2000s 4,902 t 1,698 t 3,204 t Haiti
2010s 5,307 t 4,644 t 663.77 t Haiti
2020s 4,763 t 4,953 t 189.99 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Haiti or Rwanda?
Haiti, at 4,741 t against 4,195 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Haiti and Rwanda?
546 t, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Haiti and Rwanda rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Haiti ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).