Honduras vs Nicaragua: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Honduras
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 17,608 t against 16,438 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 1,170 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 83rd and Nicaragua ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,126 t | 4,806 t | 319.6 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 5,718 t | 7,274 t | 1,556 t | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 6,066 t | 7,779 t | 1,714 t | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 9,556 t | 6,082 t | 3,474 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 12,479 t | 11,743 t | 736.1 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 15,568 t | 14,947 t | 621.32 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 18,172 t | 16,410 t | 1,762 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Honduras or Nicaragua?
- Honduras, at 17,608 t against 16,438 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Honduras and Nicaragua?
- 1,170 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Nicaragua rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Honduras ranks 83rd and Nicaragua ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).