Iraq vs Uganda: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Iraq
21,935 t
in 2023
Uganda
22,245 t
in 2023
Iraq rank
75th
Uganda rank
74th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Iraq
  • Uganda
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 22,245 t against 21,935 t in Iraq, a difference of 310 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 75th and Uganda ranks 74th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 2,200 t 1,534 t 665.89 t Iraq
1970s 5,044 t 2,230 t 2,814 t Iraq
1980s 13,283 t 2,960 t 10,323 t Iraq
1990s 21,729 t 6,453 t 15,276 t Iraq
2000s 24,065 t 10,276 t 13,789 t Iraq
2010s 16,366 t 16,734 t 368.6 t Uganda
2020s 22,206 t 21,592 t 613.58 t Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Iraq or Uganda?
Uganda, at 22,245 t against 21,935 t in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Iraq and Uganda?
310 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Uganda rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Iraq ranks 75th and Uganda ranks 74th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).