Italy vs Philippines: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Italy
- Philippines
How they compare
Italy currently reports 118,289 t against 97,042 t in Philippines, a difference of 21,247 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 27th and Philippines ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 135,675 t | 25,818 t | 109,857 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 173,349 t | 38,038 t | 135,311 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 199,759 t | 48,165 t | 151,594 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 177,200 t | 66,225 t | 110,975 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 156,583 t | 80,849 t | 75,734 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 132,694 t | 91,527 t | 41,167 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 123,206 t | 104,625 t | 18,581 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Italy or Philippines?
- Italy, at 118,289 t against 97,042 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Italy and Philippines?
- 21,247 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Philippines rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Italy ranks 27th and Philippines ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).