Japan vs Nigeria: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Japan
53,507 t
in 2023
Nigeria
52,203 t
in 2023
Japan rank
40th
Nigeria rank
41st

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Japan
  • Nigeria
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 53,507 t against 52,203 t in Nigeria, a difference of 1,304 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 40th and Nigeria ranks 41st of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 73,306 t 4,963 t 68,343 t Japan
1970s 81,861 t 9,002 t 72,859 t Japan
1980s 83,640 t 22,979 t 60,661 t Japan
1990s 74,161 t 35,225 t 38,937 t Japan
2000s 64,051 t 42,121 t 21,930 t Japan
2010s 56,547 t 64,161 t 7,614 t Nigeria
2020s 54,409 t 73,489 t 19,081 t Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Nigeria?
Japan, at 53,507 t against 52,203 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Nigeria?
1,304 t, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Nigeria rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Japan ranks 40th and Nigeria ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).