Jordan vs New Zealand: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jordan
- New Zealand
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 4,516 t against 4,015 t in New Zealand, a difference of 501 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
Jordan ranks 130th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 224.92 t | 703.59 t | 478.67 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 559.28 t | 884.81 t | 325.53 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 1,181 t | 944.83 t | 235.72 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 1,425 t | 1,777 t | 352.19 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 1,444 t | 3,421 t | 1,977 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 2,658 t | 4,351 t | 1,692 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 3,404 t | 4,488 t | 1,084 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or New Zealand?
- Jordan, at 4,516 t against 4,015 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and New Zealand?
- 501 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Jordan ranks 130th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).